Coalition Government

Today’s article is an article about how coalition governments work and how the current situation looks like in the UK.

First of all, what is a coalition government? Normally in politics you have one party in power, but sometimes during the election when no two parties manages to get the majority of votes a coalition government is formed. This is when two (or more) parties of different policies and political ideologies come together to form a coalition, collaboration between the parties.

In many countries coalition governments is the norm, like in Belgium where there can be up to six parties in one coalition, yes – at the same time! In Denmark all governments since 1982 have been coalitions. In the UK however, it’s rather rare to have coalition governments. The current one is, but that’s the first coalition government since the Churchill war ministry (1940 – 1945).

Coalition governments are quite common in countries in which a parliament is elected through the election system called proportionally representative (where each vote has approximately the same strength as everyone else’s vote), and where there are more than two political parties.

Today’s UK government is a coalition between the Conservative Party and the Liberal Democrats, and it’s called the Cameron ministry. The Blair ministry was dissolved on the 12th of April 2010, only a few weeks before the general election on the 6th of May. A hung parliament was the outcome of the election, no party having the majority of members in the House of Commons.

Fun fact: the Cameron ministry is the 90th cabinet of the UK.

On the 11th of May, the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats came to an agreement and formed a coalition government. The House of Commons has 650 seats, where the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats have 359 (303 and 56 accordingly). The biggest opposition party is the Labor Party, which has 257 seats in the House of Commons. The rest of the seats goes to smaller parties like the Scottish National Party which has a mere 6 seats, not anything close to real power.

Will the UK have a coalition government after the next election? I’m sure we’ll find out sooner rather than later, the next election is scheduled to take place on the 7th of May 2015.

Tower of London Remembers

In this article I’m going to write about the Tower of London Remembers. The Tower of London Remembers is a movement that focuses on remembering the First World War, since 2014 is the one-hundredth anniversary of the beginning of the war.

The WW1 was triggered by the assassination of Franz Ferdinand and his wife, him being the Austrian archduke. Mr. Ferdinand and his wife was shot Gavrilo Princip a Bosnian revolutionary on June 28th 1914. This event was the trigger and not the underlying cause of the WW1.

There are a few underlying causes of the WW1, the most important were maybe the alliances that had emerged over the past 40/50 years.

“By 1914, (…) alliances resulted in the six major powers of Europe coalescing into two broad groups: Britain, France and Russia formed the Triple Entente, while Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy comprised the Triple Alliance.”

Read more: http://www.theweek.co.uk/world-news/first-world-war/59782/how-did-the-first-world-war-start#ixzz3CKxlBUq0

Three other causes that came up during my digging were the following:
Nationalism – The loyalty to ones country.
Imperialism – Countries were arguing over territories and colonies.
Militarism – Britain had the most powerful navy at the time, and Germany was trying to expand theirs. By doing this they made and established strong navies in preparation of a war.

It’s important to remember that the assassination was only the trigger and the World War 1 would most likely have broken out at a later date despite of the assassination.

Germany formally surrendered on November 11th, 1918 – although the war officially ended 7 months later when the parties involved signed the Treaty of Versailles. It was signed on June 28th, 1919.

The Tower of London Remembers is a movement created in order to remember and honor the victims and soldiers and everyone involved of the WW1, especially people from the UK.

First of all you should listen to children from Grey Coat Hospital School expressing why we should remember the First World War.

 

Then, what’s the Tower of London Remembers exactly? As mentioned it’s a “movement created in order to remember and honor the victims and soldiers and everyone involved of the WW1″, what’s special is what one is doing in order to remember. What people are doing is buying what they call “poppies” which is small red ceramic flowers and laying them in front of the Tower of London.

The Tower had a unique role during the First World War. It was used as both a mobilization and recruitment site for troops. Tower of London was also used as an execution place for spies.

It’s important to remember the First World War, it was the first global war and over 40% of the people on earth lived in countries directly involved in the war. Basically every living creature on earth was affected by the war in one-way or another.
It’s now 100 years since the WW1 started and most people doesn’t think about it too much, I would argue they shouldn’t – it is however important to think about it once in a while and remember the victims and reflect over our world as a whole.

I think what they’re doing at the Tower of London is a great way to remember everyone involved in the First World War. Take a look at some of the pictures below:

Tower_of_London_viewed_from_the_River_Thames

The Tower of London on a regular day.
(Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2c/Tower_of_London_viewed_from_the_River_Thames.jpg (Last retrieved: Wednesday, September 3, 2014)) 

4119729_1bb0169b


People helping setting up the ceramic flowers.
(Source: http://s0.geograph.org.uk/geophotos/04/11/97/4119729_1bb0169b.jpg (Last retrieved: Wednesday, September 3, 2014)) 

4119368_23da7b66

How it looks today, how great looking isn’t that?
(Source: http://s0.geograph.org.uk/geophotos/04/11/93/4119368_23da7b66.jpg (Last retrieved: Wednesday, September 3, 2014)) 

Here’s what some people are saying on Twitter:

 

 

You can join the discussion about this both in the comments and on Twitter with the hashtag #towerpoppies.

 

Other Sources:

https://poppies.hrp.org.uk/faq (Last retrieved: Wednesday, September 3, 2014)

http://www.theweek.co.uk/world-news/first-world-war/59782/how-did-the-first-world-war-start (Last retrieved: Wednesday, September 3, 2014)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17KkyZwwDPA (Last retrieved: Wednesday, September 3, 2014)

http://www.hrp.org.uk/TowerOfLondon/VisitUs/Topthingstoseeanddo/Poppies/Whyremember (Last retrieved: Wednesday, September 3, 2014)

http://www.hrp.org.uk/TowerOfLondon/stories/firstworldwar (Last retrieved: Wednesday, September 3, 2014)

Scotland’s referendum

Scotland is currently a part of the United Kingdom, but that may change soon as Scotland is preparing for a referendum in which they will perform a referendum on whether or not Scotland should become an independent country. The United Kingdom came to be in 1707 after Scotland and England entered a voluntary union wanted by both parties. Now, after more than 300 years in this alliance we may face a reality where Scotland is no longer a part of the United Kingdom. The Scottish National Party is the party, which fights for Scotland’s independence. Their slogan is “Together we can make Scotland better.” – the question they’re debating in Scotland is “are they really making Scotland better?” Two key issues

  • Oil
    • The North Sea is full of oil, and that a lot of that oil is on Scottish ground. It’s been estimated that more than £1 trillion worth of oil is left on Scottish ground in the North Sea.
      There’s no wonder that there’re people who wants Scotland to be an independent country due to the financial gain keeping the oil within Scottish borders.
  • The Sterling Pound
    • The Scottish government wants to keep the Pound as a legal tender in Scotland. The three main parties in the UK doesn’t think it’s a good idea, despite the fact that the Scottish government means it is in the best interest for both countries.

If the Pound continues to be a viable mode of payment in Scotland after the possible independence that would mean that Scotland probably will have less control over the economy than they have today – in my eyes; that is not in the best interest for Scotland.   The real question is: “does the Scottish people want independence?”. The answer is currently no. The majority of people are currently leaning towards the continuation of the alliance with England.

Screenshot 2014-08-21 15.20.34

Screenshot: http://whatscotlandthinks.org/topics/referendum-voting-intention   We will find out for sure on September 18th of this year. What are your thoughts on the independence-question? Leave your answers in the comment section below.   Sources:

http://www.businessforscotland.co.uk/10-facts-about-scotlands-oil-and-independence/ (Last retrieved: Wednesday, August 20, 2014)

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-26550736 (Last retrieved: Wednesday, August 20, 2014)

http://www.snp.org (Last retrieved: Wednesday, August 20, 2014)

https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-importance-of-scotland-to-the-uk-david-camerons-speech (Last retrieved: Wednesday, August 20, 2014)

Update:

Today, Thursday, August 28, 2014, we had a Google Hangout with Ewan McIntosh. We asked him a few questions, and he raised some as well.
One important question was regarding how the Scottish felt about the independence question, which was interesting because he said that many of the people in Scotland who are on the “no” side are there because of uncertainty. They’re not sure what will happen if Scotland becomes independent, which is why they want things to be as they are.

Another point Ewan made is regarding the current foreign policies and how they will change if Scotland becomes independent. Today these questions are managed by the United Kingdom, where Scotland is represented, however they don’t have full control as the control is shared between the countries in the UK.
Digging more into foreign affairs another question that arrises is whether or not Scotland has to apply for membership in the European Union. Since the UK is a part of the union one would think that they still will be a part of the union if they become independent. Legal advice for the UK Government doesn’t think it’s that easy and they think that Scotland has to apply for a membership, contrary to what the legal advice for Scotland has said.

Thanks to Ewan McIntosh for taking the time to talk to us!

You can see the Hangout here:

Added source for the update: http://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/foreign-affairs.12345

My expectations for Social Studies English

Another summer is over and we’re back to school! Last year I had International English, which I’m building upon this year with English Social Studies.

Social Studies is a course that focuses on politics, which I look forward to learning more about this year. Another focus-point is culture & society – always fun to learn new things and differences in different cultures and societies.

As for my expectations, I look forward to learning new things, new grammar, expand my vocabulary last but not least learn about the different political systems in the English-speaking world.

Varieties of English…

In this post I’ll write about a two varieties of English and reflect on their distinctive character. The post is focused on covering the following competency aim: “Give examples of other varieties of English than those that are used in the Anglo-American core area, and reflect on their distinctive character” First of all, the English I’m used to is American English as well as British English. It’s worth pointing out that the English I usually find myself listening to is TV-English, which, from my experience can be quite different from the English you’ll hear “on the street”. This could be caused by quite a few different things, one of which being the fact that both the US and England (London) have quite a diversity. In this text I’ll focus on “Chinglish” and Indian English.

Chinglish

Chinglish is a form of English that is influenced by Chinese. The language is applied in both written and spoken fashion. The Chinese language heavily influences this variety of English; a lot of errors are being made in regards to syntax, word’s meaning and spelling, this has to do with the usage of Chinese grammar and translations. It’s also worth noting that quite a few Chinese words are being used in Chinglish (“day-to-day” words that is). Chinglish is also known for its wordiness, meaning using an excessive amount of words to get a message across. Take a look at the signs below, spot something wrong? Untitled 1I love that second one: “take care of your slip” – good thing they’ve added an image to the sign… After the IOC chose Beijing as the 2008 Olympic city in 2001 they quickly started locating signs that had bad translations and change them with better ones. This was both so they wouldn’t be laughed at as well as making it easier for tourists to understand what they really meant.

Indian English

Indian English is a kind of English that’s spoken in India (that wasn’t so hard to guess?). The language arose after England colonized India in the mid-1800. It is today, together with Hindi, the official language of India – and is the only reliable form of communication between different non-Hindi states.

The different phonological differences

In India they have quite an accent, and often words sound quite different from the traditional American English, although understandable. Words like “class” and “staff” are in America pronounced with and æ-sound whereas in India they’re pronounced with an “a”, like southern British dialects. Adding to the list is the word “but”, in American English often pronounced /bøt/ and in India often pronounced /bʊt/. Learn more about the different features here: http://www.phonologics.com/White-Papers/indian-english-a-phonologics-inc-working-paper.html One thing I find really interesting is how they write numbers. Internationally one would write one hundred thousands like this: 100,000, but in India one would write it like this: 1,00,000. Or one million, Int.: 1,000,000, in India: 10,00,000. It separates with a comma on every second number, except numbers between 1-100. 2 To be honest I think there’s only one way to talk Indian English, check out this video:

Earth Day – Public Transit In Oslo & Akershus

Today is Earth Day, my friend Ulrik (check out his blog) and I wanted to write about the public transport in Oslo & Akershus. We see major points of improvement and the local operators, Ruter and NSB, are using them to some degree, albeit they still have a long way to go. We’ve seen problems and effectiveness and the payment options available.

The biggest problem with the effectiveness of busses in Akershus is that every new passenger has to go through the bus driver. Ruter, the local transit operator, is partly adopting the system they use in Holland on the buses in Oslo, where you can “hop-on & hop-off” using the doors in the back, the middle and the front.

In Holland they’ve taken everything a step further, the only valid form of payment is a card called OV-Chipkaart. This is a card you prepay or connect with your bank account, and every time you take the bus you “check in” and when you leave you “check out”. The OV-Chipkaart is the only valid form of payment for public transit in the Kingdom of The Netherlands.

Norway have a different and maybe better system in the works, the Ruter app. With this app you can buy the ticket on your phone, this works great in theory not so much in practice; because of the aforementioned reasons – not being able to use all doors on the bus. Another problem is that you still have the option of paying with cash, this often takes a lot of time and really slows the busses down – not effective.

There’s also an option to use a Ruter card, much like the card in Holland, although not so effective. The card readers are not good, reading failure the card is an everyday experience for a passenger. And Ruter loves to go through the bus driver, you can buy a prepaid card – and whenever you want to walk onboard you have to say to the bus driver where you want to go and usually give him the card so he can put the card on the reader whenever he’s ready.

The optimal solution would include the app, ability to walk through the door you prefer and dismissal of the cash and card payments. This would increase the effectiveness (more time for more routes) and improve the user-experience

In Oslo/Akershus the amount of people taking public transport is increasing. However, many people are complaining about crowded and delayed buses and trains, as well as high fares. Ruter are buying more buses but, as mentioned, the method for buying tickets outside of Oslo is somewhat bothersome. The local trains departs every half hour, with direct trains in between. During rush hour the trains are extremely crowded, and NSB (the company responsible for the trains – while Ruter controls the tickets and the buses) does not always have enough train cars to cover the amount of people. This makes it more tempting driving to work for a lot of people. How can we make more people use public transport? It needs to look easy, and it needs to be tempting.

Low prices and efficiency, that is probably the key.

Edward Snowden – LiveLeaks interview

On LiveLeaks you can view the full interview of Edward Snowden done by Norddeutscher Rundfunk, a German television broadcaster, watch it here: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f93_1390833151.

Early in the interview Edward Snowden refers to a Buzzfeed article where government officials has been interviewed and they’ve shared their thoughts about Edward Snowden and what they think should be done with him. What’s really interesting is that many of those officials say that they wants to shoot Edward Snowden. Although what he’s done may not be correct from their point of view, that’s a little harsh I think.

Snowden also shared his own thoughts on what he’s done, and he states that what he’s done is in the public’s interest. He felt that he had to do what he did, what he’s released is in, again, the best public’s interest.

Obama hasn’t said much regarding Snowden, but he has, in the time after the unauthorized disclosures, talked a lot more about surveillance, NSA and national security. On Friday 17th 2014, Obama said the following regarding Snowden’s case: “Given the fact of an open investigation, I’m not going to dwell on Mr. Snowden’s actions or motivations”. Meaning since it’s an open investigation he wouldn’t talk about that particular case.

He also said: “If any individual who objects to government policy can take it in their own hands to publicly disclose classified information, then we will never be able to keep our people safe, or conduct foreign policy.”

Although I won’t state my own thoughts I will say this: if the American government had been more transparent with what they did they would’ve probably been in a different situation today.

During the interview done by the German reporters Snowden hints to more German officials being wiretapped, with that we can probably expect that more non-German officials are also being tapped.

What I find really interesting is what he says about a program called XKEYSCORE (XKS). Which is basically a program where you could get access of all the information you could possibly want. 

He describes it as follows:
“You could read anyone’s email in the world, anybody you’ve got an email address for. Any website: You can watch traffic to and from it. Any computer that an individual sits at: You can watch it. Any laptop that you’re tracking: you can follow it as it moves from place to place throughout the world. It’s a one-stop-shop for access to the NSA’s information.

He adds:
“…You can tag individuals… Let’s say you work at a major German corporation and I want access to that network, I can track your username on a website on a form somewhere, I can track your real name, I can track associations with your friends and I can build what’s called a fingerprint, which is network activity unique to you, which means anywhere you go in the world, anywhere you try to sort of hide your online presence, your identity.”

XKS is described as a system with different user interfaces, a bunch of back-end databases and servers. The system apparently gathers information that the NSA already has gathered and gives the end-user easy access to everything. Snowden’s description is basically a system where you can search for and get access to information once believed to be secure and only shared between two parties.

The system, XKS, is being shared with other intelligence & spy agencies among others we have Australia’s Defense Signals Directorate, New Zealand’s Government Communications Security Bureau and the German Bundesnachrichtendienst. This means that it’s not only the US that has access to your email, but also agencies in other countries.

As a computer enthusiast I would love to know how it all works, because this is crazy!

Although we unknowingly known a lot of what Snowden leaked it still came as a shock to basically the whole world. He is now in Russia, after he got granted asylum there. He applied for asylum in many European countries but no one would grant him asylum in fear of getting off on the wrong foot with The United States.

Finally, as an assignment I’ve been asked to answer whether or not I agree with Snowden’s decisions. I think that’s a difficult question, I would say that I’m all for what’s in the public’s best interest. Obama should think the same, and I think it’s important that he’s been more transparent regarding what they’re doing in terms of tracking and surveillance of the public. Lastly, my final thoughts – I think what Snowden has done is important and although I may not agree with all of his methods I think he has done the general public a favor.

Smartwatches – The technology of tomorrow

This is the text only version, if you’d like to read the whole article with images (++) download it here: Smartwatches – The technology of tomorrow.

 

The wearable space

One can define wearable technology as follows:

Technology you wear that incorporates computer and advanced electronic technologies. The designs often incorporate practical functions and features, but may also have a purely critical or aesthetic agenda.

There’s no doubt that there’s many use cases for wearable technology; Google Glass, Smartwatches, different biometric sensors all represent a different segment of the wearable space. Google Glass and all kinds of biometric sensors represent the technology of the future; smartwatches represent the technology of tomorrow.

Watches have been available for quite some time, in spite of this it’s only in the recent years that smartwatches has taken off as a consumer product. With Google’s recently released Android Wear this space is now really heating up.

In just a few years we have moved our lives away from the desktop computer and into our smartphones and tablets. It’s been a drastic change, and our lives have changed accordingly. The wearable technology that’s being developed right now will bring the same type of change. We’ll be able to have real glanceable information just a glimpse away. No more taking out your phone to check the latest messages, flick your wrist, see the message and reply using voice commands.

Only one question remains; is this just a fad, or are smartwatches here to stay?

The history of smartwatches

After failing to attract investors Pebble Technology sought out help from Kickstarter, a worldwide crowd-sourcing platform. In April 2012 their campaign for funding the Pebble Smartwatch went live on Kickstarter. After raising over $10.2M it was the most successful campaign ever to be launched on Kickstarter.

As if this weren’t enough, on the 20th of March 2014 Pebble announced that they sold over
400 000 Pebbles in 2013, not bad for a company that employed, at that time, under 50 people. It’s been estimated that this brought in over $60M in revenues for the company. According to George Zachary, a Charles River Ventures partner and Pebble investor, the smartwatch maker is on track to double its revenues in 2014.

The second iteration of the Pebble, the Pebble Steel, was introduced at CES in early 2014. Although priced $100 over the original Pebble smartwatch the device is in high demand. The new version features many improvements over the first Pebble, and reviewers seem to agree that the price jump is justified.

One cannot write about smartwatches and not include Samsung’s Galaxy Gear. Introduced at Samsung’s Unpacked event on September 4th 2013, the electronics manufacturer was the first of the major companies to introduce a smartwatch to the market. Some critics argue that this device was designed and pushed in a hurry just to beat Apple and Google to the finish line. The watch received generally negative feedback and was criticized for poor battery life and lack of apps available. Despite the negative reviews Samsung continues iterating the device; the second generation of the smartwatch, the Gear 2, was unveiled on February 23rd 2014 and it’s expected to hit the shelves sometime in April.

The biggest news so far in 2014 is undoubtedly the announcement of Google’s new OS, Android Wear. Since being revealed on March 18th, technology enthusiasts all over the world have dubbed this the biggest step for smartwatches ever. Built on Google’s already open Android platform, the OS is made to work seamlessly with a smartphone. This is the first step by one of the three big ones into the marketplace. Seeing a major company like Google releasing its own dedicated smartwatch OS is a sure sign that we’ll be seeing some rather great products in the near future.

On the same day, LG and Motorola also revealed their smartwatch plans, and yes, they’ll be running Android Wear. Both companies say that their watches will be available sometime this summer.

 

The watch as an assistant

Google Now will play a major role in Google’s smartwatch move. Google Now is of course Google’s take on a personal assistant, and if the experience is anything like it’s on the mobile platform, it’ll be nothing short of amazing. Glancing at your wrist and having the device instantly knowing what information you’re looking for is something that one could only dream of 5 years ago. Being at home and your watch buzzes because you’re late for work or your eTicket shows up just as you’re about to board the plane, it’s a phenomenal thought, and it’s soon becoming your reality.

Android is built on openness, and Android Wear is no different. Developers can take advantage of loads of API integrations and by that help building the perfect assistant. We should expect to see some great apps and great design languages being developed for the new platform.

Apple takes a different approach, as usual. They have yet to release anything regarding a smartwatch, but the rumor-mill has it that they’re building a watch to be released either in Q3 or Q4 of 2014 or early 2015. One theory is that we’ll see something this summer at Apple’s yearly WWDC conference at the same time as they’re showing of iOS 8.

The latest spinning out of the mill is that Apple is heavily focused on health and fitness for their new iOS, and with the iWatch they’re expected to ship a version of iOS 8 that includes an app called Healthbook which will mark their entrance into the world of smartwatches, health and fitness.

We also expect Apple to tightly integrate Siri into the iWatch. Analysts seems to think that it’ll play a role much like Google Now will on devices running Android Wear. It will however be essential for Apple to figure out how to make Siri faster. Google Now usually parses voice right on the device, and if unsure they send the voice clip to the cloud to be parsed. Apple approaches this differently; everything is sent and parsed in the cloud. This is a major drawback and it’s something that the Big Green has to figure out before launching the iWatch. They cannot send voice commands from the watch to the phone and then to Nuance’s servers – it will not be the Apple experience.

Apple likes to “keep it closed”, but recently it has opened their products and services slightly for third-party developers. CarPlay, Apple’s new dashboard for your car, currently includes support for Spotify, Rdio and YouTube, in addition to a few essentials like phone and messages. Although currently “invitation only”, they’ve said they want to open it up to all third-party developers in the near future. This marks a big step for Apple regarding their openness. We never expect Apple to open the iOS platform the way Google has done with Android, but it’ll be a nice addition for developers to get a little more freedom. If this freedom will make its way to the iWatch is currently unknown. It isn’t unheard of for Apple to include third-party integration opportunities, even though it has usually come as a possibility for the second or third iteration of the product or service.

 

The main hurdle

As with phones, a smartwatch can’t do much without energy. Hardware engineers have for the past few years been struggling to find a solution to smartwatches’ battery consumption and battery capacity. Pebble managed to overcome this problem by using e-paper technology. Unlike a regular LCD display, which emits light, e-paper is designed to reflect light like ordinary paper, thus making it easier to read and giving it greater battery life.

The two biggest drawbacks of using e-paper technology are the display’s refresh rate and color saturation. The Pebble smartwatch incorporates a black and white screen, whereas the new Moto 360, from now Lenovo owned Motorola, will have a beautiful and colorful display.

Little has been said about the Moto 360, including battery life and performance. It’s been speculated that the black bar at the bottom is a solar panel in order to increase battery life. Though we won’t know for sure until Motorola reveals all the details.

We know Apple has been having a hard time figuring out how to manage the battery consumption on their devices and how to fit a big enough battery into them. There have been a few job openings for battery specialists at the Cupertino based company. Even though we can’t be sure they’re for the alleged smartwatch it won’t be surprising if they’re. It’s however, also fully possible that these job openings are “only” for the iPhone and directed towards its share of battery issues.

One way one could solve the battery issue is to know the user, for example knowing his or her habits. This would mean that the device could allocate battery power differently throughout the day. If the device knows that you’re not usually using it between 9am and 11am, there’s no reason for it to use power during that period of time, it could go into power saving mode. Google already know a lot about us, they know your calendar and they know where you are. They could use this information to distribute battery power differently; thus increase battery life greatly.

The interoperability between operating systems

The major companies have all taken completely different approaches to the interoperability between devices before. Will this change this time around? Will the iWatch be compatible with an Android phone? Will Google still support iOS devices?

Currently there’s no info on whether or not Android Wear will be able to pair to an iPhone, if history is anything to go by it should be possible, we should however, expect limited functionality and features. There’s also the possibility that Google’s new OS won’t be available for iPhone users at all, because Wear is simply a modified version of Android, and no Android device has ever played nicely with Apple’s phone and tablet OS.

One can argue back and forth on whether or not it could be a good move for Google to close its ecosystem a little more. On the one hand it’s a good thing, simply because Google can focus on making two Android devices work flawlessly together. On the other hand, Google is closing the door to a big audience by doing so. This is also the audience who is very well known for their willingness to pay good money for great experiences.

Apple will surely not open up its watch to other platforms. It’s not in Apple’s nature in doing so. Except for iTunes and Safari there’s few examples of Apple software ported over to other operating systems. Apple likes to keep everything within its own ecosystem. This way they can ensure that anything that leaves Cupertino Headquarters has the famous “it just works” factor. Apple is so dedicated to their own platforms that they do not “waste” time on others.

The future…

The introduction of Android Wear, the recent rumors about Apple’s iWatch and the latest sales numbers from Pebble all point to a bright future for smartwatches around the world. In a few years we could see smartwatches dominating our wrists. Apple will most likely introduce their version of a watch later this year; several companies have already announced that they’re bringing smartwatches to the market this summer. When engineers manages to overcome the battery hurdle, and manages a seamless integration with your smartphone we should see some really great accessories for your wrists.

Despite of everything, sometimes it seems that only technology enthusiasts are interested in the smartwatch. Unlike “regular” people, this is a group who knows what they want and how they want it. Is the general public really interested in wearable technology? Are they ready for the smartwatch? Will the regular Joe understand what this new type of device is, what it is for and will he be able to take full advantage of it? Finally, will he be willing to spend several hundred dollars on a little personal assistant?

These are all questions that have yet to be answered, if the trend is something to go by the answers will be here sooner rather than later.

The question will most likely be; which watch should you buy?